In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In some countries, many people believe that it is important to pay large amount of money to build new railway lines for high speed trains between cities while some others think the money can be spent on upgrading public transport. Personally, I am convinced that it will be better if we use money to improving existing public transport.
On the one hand, spend high budget to constructing new railway lines gain some benefit. Firstly, it can be clearly seen that, traveling between cities will be easier. if residents use high speed train instead of traditional trains , it will definitely faster and save their time. As a result, passengers may fell convinient and reduce traffic congestion con the highway. Moreover, many transport services will be better if we build new railway lines. For instance, goods transport service will be cheaper and increase merits for customer and companies.
one the other hand, there are several reasons why we should spend money to improve existing public transport. The first and the most important reason is public transport can serve most people who travel inside the city. there are huge number of resident travel in the city by car so that become a serious problem lead to the traffic congestion in rush hours. Thus, upgrade public transports may encourage people use use bus or subway instead of drive by themselves. Furthermore, improve public transports can reduce the air pollution in the urban areas. For example, when passengers prefer use bus or some others thing, we can make our atmosphere become cleaner and fresher. Last but not least, civilian can save a lot of money spend to gas or parking when use public transport.Consequence, saving money for gas it mean we can reduce the fossil energy which is very rare at the moment and the economic can gain some benefits from saving money from transport. Due to those arguments we can clearly seen that , there are various of reason why spend money to improving existing public transport is a good ideal.
In conclusion, even use large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for fast trains have some positive aspects, I am strongly argue that spend money to upgrading public transport is better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some People Think That Universities Should Provide Graduates with the Knowledge and Skills Needed in the Workplace. Others Think That the True Function of a University Should Be to Give Access to Knowledge for Its Own 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...raveling between cities will be easier. if residents use high speed train instead ...
^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...peed train instead of traditional trains , it will definitely faster and save thei...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...e merits for customer and companies. one the other hand, there are several reaso...
^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...most people who travel inside the city. there are huge number of resident travel in t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: use
... public transports may encourage people use use bus or subway instead of drive by thems...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 607, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... when passengers prefer use bus or some others thing, we can make our atmosphere becom...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 779, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequence
...as or parking when use public transport.Consequence, saving money for gas it mean we can re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 816, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
...rt.Consequence, saving money for gas it mean we can reduce the fossil energy which i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1007, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...those arguments we can clearly seen that , there are various of reason why spend m...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'argued'.
Suggestion: argued
...ve some positive aspects, I am strongly argue that spend money to upgrading public tr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9972899729 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6355618173 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50135501355 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5718307572 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.470588235 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430124780918 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143218043143 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116938647677 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31769545486 0.151304729494 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108981275879 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.