The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It cannot be denied that people today have to face many climate-related problems such as air pollution, especially in big cities. Some people claim that the main reason which causes those problems is the increase rapidly in the number of vehicles on our roads, and it seems that growth is due to individually traveling for work, education, and shopping purposes. Therefore, probably, traffic using for those purposed have to restrict to reduce the amount of traffic in the cities. I disagree with this opinion for the following reasons.
First of all, it is undoubtedly correct to say that there are more and more people use private cars to travel and this put our environment in danger. Researches have shown that more than 80% of carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere come from private cars, so it is urgent to cut the amount of traffic as soon as possible. However, it is probably not the ideal long-term solution for traffic-related problems. People have to go to the offices to work, and children have to go to schools, so they have to use traffic every day. There would be better solutions which are developing public transports and think about environmentally friendly fuels. Some people complain that they are not using public transport because it is dirty and inconvenient like stations are far from their companies. Furthermore, carbon dioxide enters the atmosphere through burning fossil fuels, so if solar energy is used in all private cars, it will help reduce the level of carbon dioxide.
Besides, there is an opinion saying that we are living in an era of technology, so it is possible for people to work, study, or buy products online from home. They maintain that everything we need is available on the Internet: people can work at home with emails, children can study at home with online lectures; so, it is right to ban vehicles. However, although the technology for working, studying or shopping online makes this option a possibility, it would mean people have less freedom of choice, less social contact, and many health-related problems. This would have a significant<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> impact </span>on not only individuals but also a whole society. Therefore, it seems adverse effects outweigh the advantage of staying at home to work or study.
In conclusion, I think there are certain reasons to reduce the need for people to travel by using traffic on the roads, but it is most unlikely the acceptable solution. Perhaps, we have to think about a careful plan to develop facilitating public transport and the alternative energies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | chetan kakollu | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | chetan kakollu | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Arman Abdullah | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | thaivu220802 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | thaivu220802 | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 an the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing. What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend. 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08430913349 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94391407869 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52224824356 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2640471729 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.611111111 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7222222222 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252247988127 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800290087624 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622379159336 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161825781609 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384129016599 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.