Hiking salaries of the employees, depending on their productivity and dedication, is thought to be the key to motivate them. However, I disagree with the statement; as, this is one of the ways but not the optimum method of encouragement. This essay will talk about various ways to motivate employees and the factors that prevent more pay from being the most effective way for the same.
Firstly, salaries are hiked at a particular time of the year; as a result some employees show better conduct only at that period while maintaining poor performance for the entire year. Thus, a hike of this kind will discourage genuine workers, that perform well all year round. Secondly, all employees receive a hike once a year, irrespective of their performance and only a variation in level of pay cannot be really considered motivational. However, increasing the pay is undoubtedly rewarding but when it comes to motivating people it lacks because of the above factors.
Whereas, arranging felicitation ceremonies can be quite motivating. It not only brings respect to the person but also recognition and fame among their colleagues. For instance, "best employee award" can be awarded to the person who have shown extraordinary performance throughout the year. Additionally, bonuses for 100% attendance every month or twice a month will increase regularity and also performance. A trip coupon with family for performing better can be rewarding and drive an employee to perform well in order to get hailed by the family.
So, to recapitulate, it is a good way to increase the pay to encourage people but encouragement should be unceasing and perennial process for better performance. This can be achieved through ways that brings fame and recognition along with money.
- Organised tours to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for people and environment. 89
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measure are requiredpossibly some of the society possessed h 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 67
- Some people think traveling abroadis a valuable experience for young people. Others think it wastes too much time and expense. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it lacks because of the above factors. Whereas, arranging felicitation ceremoni...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...acks because of the above factors. Whereas, arranging felicitation ceremonies can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '; the best'.
Suggestion: ; the best
...ng their colleagues. For instance, 'best employee award' can be awarded to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstance, 'best employee award' can be awarded to the person who have sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21678321678 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03318403481 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583916083916 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1873501582 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260050449121 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873232736806 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496086529438 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161226657739 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329929252862 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.