A person’s worth nowadays is not based on values such as honour, kindness and trust, but on social status and material possessions.
I think that it is one of the major plague of our society because some people, especially during the school, decide to make a new friend only if he has the last model of smartphone or very expensive clothes. For this reason, children decide to ask to their families more and more objects to be accepted by others.
Sometimes it happens that students steal money from others to buy high-priced products and so they do not have to ask more money to their parents. To reduce this risk, the parents should give few coins to their children and teachers should assign more severe punishment to students who steal something.
Not all people judge others according to social status and material possession. There are a lot of people who watch at the values of who is in front of them. As a consequence, they find the better in others and they try to become better people and help others to make the same.
These people should teach to others that there are other values beyond the social status and material possessions. Unfortunately they are not considered and they are abandoned and described as losers.
In conclusion, there are two types of people: the first who judge others according to social status and material possession, the second who judge people resting on their honour, kindness and trust.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 82
- The consumption of fast food in the UK from 1970 to 1990. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople and help others to make the same. These people should teach to others that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are abandoned and described as losers. In conclusion, there are two types of pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88259109312 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53275676377 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3866500112 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193701590256 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874474576263 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114790383621 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130561755331 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125099216343 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.