It is sometimes argued that capital punishment is necessary to decrease that rate of violent crimes and to help our lives to be safer. In my opinion, I partly agree with this idea.
On the one hand, death penalty is disadvantageous to some extent. First of all, innocent people can be wrongly convicted and executed before the truth is revealed. Such unfair sentences take away the lives of innocent people and make other citizens lose faith in law and justice. Secondly, sometimes criminals repent their acts. In this case they should be given a second chance to start over and improve themselves.
On the other hand, it is clear that capital punishment would bring some major advantages. One evident strength is that it is an effective deterrent of crimes since the fear of death penalty stops people from committing offences. Accordingly, the crime rates would certainly decrease and our society would become a safer place to live in. Another reason is that the government can avoid the cost of imprisonment and save large sums of national budget. Instead, this money can be used for development of the society and welfare of the people. Last but not least, capital punishment show that crime is not tolerated. Criminals cannot pose a threat to others, which allows people to feel more secure.
In conclusion, while there are some negative effects of death penalty, I still believe that it proves to be the best way of controlling crimes, lessening governmental expenses and preventing other people from commiting offences. Courts should give sound judgement to prevent the innocent from facing wrongly execution.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- the graph below shows changes in the distribution of average household income between 1965 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Hydro-electric power generation. 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08988764045 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62476014539 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8477523291 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14923778973 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501290174894 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736313040512 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968729999047 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079155691906 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.