Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Governments cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further damage.
What are your views? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Technological progress improves people’s lives, but at the same time it causes numerous problems, namely, climate changing. Although few would deny that protecting the environment is a humans’ duty, I find government to be of great power in a matter of fixing such problems as a greenhouse effect and global warming.
On the one hand, I agree that solving these global issues requires the cooperation of all people around the world. A variety of measures can be taken in order to prevent our unique planet from suffering. First of all, scientists tend to encourage individuals to use public transport instead of driving a car. In this case less gasoline and gas would be burnt and consequently less carbon dioxide would be added to the atmosphere. In many cities, such as Berlin, Amsterdam, Paris, residents choose a bicycle over a car while moving around. Another step that needs to be taken for the sake of the Earth is to control the energy consumption. Special energy-saving devices are available nowadays and can be afforded by every person. In other words, if we simply try to stop poisoning air, water and lands, it will be a good start in protecting the world we live in.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that essential actions must be arranged by the government to avoid dramatic consequences. Firstly, it is within the authorities’ power to minimize the process of deforesting large areas of lands. Otherwise, disappearance of flora can lead to nature disbalance and global warming. Secondly, some countries, including Russia, have already enacted laws concerning the air clearing, such as a policy against smoking in public places. More than that, supporting ecological organizations like “Greenpeace” would be beneficial for the planet as well. All in all, many canons can be made by the leaders to provide their people a better future.
In conclusion, if we want our planet to stay a comfortable and suitable place for a living, every person, including the rulers, should be responsible for saving the ecology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | mynameisduyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | sheru | 87 | view |
- High job demands stress and sense of commitment are among the main reasons people go to work when they are ill This way they accomplish important tasks but may infect others or get some serious health problems themselves In your opinion should people go t 73
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 78
- People today know fewer of their neighbors than in the past Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- In some parts of the world the rate of divorce has increased dramatically over the past few decades Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13095238095 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08517135876 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633928571429 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7197987205 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.411764706 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119601298316 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340675868857 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023276480323 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660780131079 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189804819701 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.