Scientists have found the environmental problems are still serious because many people have not changed their lifestyle.
Why do they refuse to change their lifestyle and how do we encourage them to?
Environment is a rising issue that humans must deal with these days. Despite numerous measures that are taken to improve the habitat, the issue remains serious because there are many people who have not changed their bad habit to make the ecosystem better. This essay will provide some reasons and solutions for this phenomenon.
On the one hand, some people do not have the chance to improve their knowledge about the environment. To explain, they are probably out-dated ones that may not have the awareness of the permanent damages caused by their awful lifestyle. Added to that, it seems difficult for one to change his habit and start doing new things, so he chooses to retain his daily life. As a consequence, the environment could not become sustainable with just little effort made by the others. Furthermore, it may get worse if the number of unconcious people increases gradually.
On the other hand, there are some outstanding ideas that can change humans's lifestyle to better the ecosystem. Firstly, the profound effects should be demonstrated to people of all ages so that they can imagine the present situation clearly. When humans get detailed information about those effect, they might consider to make the better actions. Secondly, they should be encouraged to change small thing first to offset the adverse rather than starting with big change. One person, for instance, can start planting a tree monthly then make it as a weekly habit.
All in all, some conservative people who keep a bad lifestyle, in likelihood have a bad influence to the habitat, but they can attempt to make effort to offset their fallacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Scientists have found the environmental problems are still serious because many people have not changed their lifestyle Why do they refuse to change their lifestyle and how do we encourage them to 78
- Scientists have found the environmental problems are still serious because many people have not changed their lifestyle Why do they refuse to change their lifestyle and how do we encourage them to 61
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give you 67
- Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e encouraged to change small thing first to offset the adverse rather than starti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01102941176 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56454049909 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595588235294 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3497238614 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254065245386 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077278063758 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779756784251 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14274577331 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387001703877 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.