Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer
nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples
and with relevant evidence.
There is a debate that whether rich countries must provide many things for poorer ones or let their government take care them as it is their must-to-do things. To me, I do not strongly stand on what specific side. I think nurturing the citizens is the main mission of their government but wealthy countries should also give a hand with some stuffs supply only for those who have shortage of natural resources.
First of all, poor nations usually suffer famine, drought or many disasters all the time. They really need support from other countries. Even though each country have their own vision, mission and responsibility for their civilization, the scarcity of nature lead them to impoverishment. They want to independent but the conditions do not let them accomplish.
Secondly, the undeveloped countries do not have enough educated people to teach children since they all concentrate on survival first. Therefore, they can not update with the world, their vision will be narrow and they never catch others. That is why the wealthy nations should aid to widen their knowledge.
On the other hand, rich countries should not give a great deal of things in many fields to the poorer. These actions will make the government and people in undeveloped nations dependent and completely lean on the givers. Hence, the givers should only supply enough the poor’s demand when their need is extremely essential.
To sum up, wealthy nations should be sympathy with the deficient ones by assisting them with daily stuffs and education but still can let them stand on their feet.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of thefollowing topic:The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. Thenew fashion mil be to have s 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do 31
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of thefollowing topic:The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. Thenew fashion mil be to have s 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion mil be to have 87
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who have shortage of natural resources. First of all, poor nations usually suffe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 38, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... To sum up, wealthy nations should be sympathy with the deficient ones by assisting th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, i think, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07279693487 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58935242227 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9632021001 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5714285714 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216426741673 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756335521351 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658463269343 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13105836718 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041104971337 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.