Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, technology occupies a pivotal role in our life that humans cannot deny. It, however, is commonly argued that state-of-the-art technology gives rise to a complicated society and people should get rid of those advances to deal with the problem. From my perspective, I completely contradict the statement and this essay will address the explanations for my views as follows.
To begin with, the argument in favour of eliminating the leading - edge technology altogether from our life would be to make our community more and more transparent. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Consider how difficult our lives were prior to the invention of technology. During a war, for example, pigeons or soldiers were more likely to send classified information between locations. However, thanks to technological advancements, delivering that information takes only a few seconds. Another evidence to illustrate this point is the invention of the smartphone; if humans could not create a smartphone, they would just meet their relatives or their friends in person. Because of the advantageous phone, they can see those who they want no matter the distance. In addition, smartphones act as calculators, clocks, cameras, calendars and music players which are convenient for humans.
On the other hand, even though the present - day technology looks complex in some aspects such as users spending a multitude of time on modern devices that lead to forget to take time with their relationship, its advantages outweigh the complications in numerous features of life. In terms of economy, the invention of automatic machines brings a myriad of benefits such as reducing the assistance of humans in making products. When it comes to medical, technology helps scientists and doctors find a throng of innovative methods to cure patients. It is a diminutive part of technology's benefits; it, therefore, is tough for us to grow without them, and finding anything else to replace the technology is challenging.
To sum up, I strongly believe that technology has tremendous advantages in our life and we should utilise technology in positive ways to become wise users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | maiphuonganh | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | An Hai Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Luisjackiet | 89 | view |
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important reason factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- Government should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 90
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omy, the invention of automatic machines brings a myriad of benefits such as redu...
^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o cure patients. It is a diminutive part of technologys benefits; it, therefore, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27793696275 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07077839544 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627507163324 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9551714822 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230597250968 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067161024569 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653864470428 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14569658051 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419027559712 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.