In this day and age, there is still discrimination between the sexes. While it seems proper to a certain extent that women are more aggressive than men due to the fact some people who are always stood by the side of women, I firmly believe that men are more competitive than women due to some reasons that I will mention in this essay.
First and foremost, women have inherent biological duties that are unique to them, which render them unable to compete as frequently as men. For instance, some research proved that the health of a woman seems to be always not as strong as a man to do heavy work frequently. Therefore, in the work environment, the leaders always divide the work for women are usually lighter than men.
Furthermore, women simply have various outlets for their competitive qualities. Take the example for this opinion, women often have a plethora of ways to deal with the problem together without competing with each other. They can reconcile and know how to balance the tasks. This can be said because of their characteristic: more tolerant than men and not as impatient or violent as men. Thus, men are genetically more aggressive than women.
As shown above, women are less competitive than men and several studies have shown that. Besides, contemporary society has witnessed modern women rapidly progressing in professional and personal spheres. Because of that, governments seem to always update the policy about equality to ensure that women are not disadvantaged in this modern society.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevant 73
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99212598425 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66149885725 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0875128789 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5384615385 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30922235743 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106660002315 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980208560226 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192223546864 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683595087593 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.