Time is changing and so are the influential recommended manners in advertising, contributing to a drastic increase in profit margins. Although it is opined by some that one of the major demerits of sports sponsorship is an unwanted distraction from an important match owing to advertisements, it will be proven by this essay that this may not be the case. Throughout the following paragraphs, the sales growth of companies as an undeniable virtue of corporate sponsors to endorse their products during major sports events will be meticulously scrutinized to rationally advocate this logical standpoint.
On the one side, it is postulated that offering a hefty amount of money by numerous firms to well-known sports clubs to do commercials for their merchandise should be omitted inasmuch as viewers are likely to fail to center their utmost attention to the athletic competitions. Take an enticing advertisement for a state-of-the-art BMW X6 2020 on the T-shirts of Barcelona football players, as an illustration. Doing so, a plethora of their spectators would surf the Internet in the middle of a momentous soccer game in order to gather information about the luxurious car, touched upon earlier, contributing to losing track of the football tournament. This glaringly apparent instance exemplifies that should manufacturers support financially sports to publicize their commodities, this can act as a catalyst for fans to deflect their attention from a contest to an advertisement. However, this viewpoint is refuted by this essay.
On the other hand, sports sponsorship, without a shadow of a doubt, is an effective way for innumerable companies to acquire a global reputation, culminating in healthy profits. Coca-cola Company, producing soft drinks, has capitalized on this practical advertising method to receive publicity the world over, resulting in making a major sale, to illustrate. By shedding a light on this example, it is crystal clear that paying vast sums of money to sports by businesses to do endorsements of their products is inextricably interwoven with their lucrativeness. The utilization of this approach by companies, thus, has considerably beneficial effects on their ever-growing sales.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis of the unavoidable advantage of financing sports by firms to promote their goods, it can be concluded that this policy catalyzes companies to be able to sell their products dramatically. Based on the aforementioned compelling grounds, it is hoped these significant points will be taken into account by entrepreneurs in the foreseeable future.
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- You work for an international company and like to spend six months working in its head office in another country.Write a letter to your manager. In your lellerExplain why you want to work in the company's head office for six monthsSay how your work c 73
- Some people think that prison sentences should not be used in dealing with criminals. Education and job training should be used instead.To what extent do you agree on disagree? 67
- These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before Is it a positive or negative development 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally advocate this logical standpoint. On the one side, it is postulated that o...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is viewpoint is refuted by this essay. On the other hand, sports sponsorship, w...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l effects on their ever-growing sales. To recapitulate, after careful situation...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51990049751 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35332702086 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2722141282 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.5 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0759589730947 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267163910561 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029661635192 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498276175923 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221708377126 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.