In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are an increasing number of people who are excessively consuming fast foods causing fatal diseases. To solve this issue, the desperate measure should be sought. I believe that the government should not impose tax on fast food because this food is the main food source for low income earners. Therefore, I completely disagree with this proposal.
It is a fact that there are an increasing number of people consuming excessive amount of fast foods and the result would be the fatal health issues. Since fast food is full of chemical substances, it can cause several health diseases that can be fatal to people such as cancer, diabetes, tumor and Alzheimer. Therefore, the optimal and effective solution should be planted to tackle this issue.
Imposing higher taxes on fast food can reduce the excessive consumption and can maintain people’s health diet. For example, McDonald’s burger price increased from $2.45 to $12.45 after junk food taxation, people will eat somewhere else. This will definitely reduce people’s consumption and people can re-consider of their choice on fast food before purchasing. Hence, higher taxation can solve the fast food consumption effectively.
In contrast, this higher price on food can restrict a lower income earner’s daily meal. Even in developed countries there are a lot of people who are still suffering from hunger and poverty, the fast foods are the main meal for them. If the government imposes taxes to increase the price, all those people will face the difficulty to survive. Majority of population are categorized as low income earner brackets and the increasing in fast food price. Thus, the government should not restrict the main food source for low income earners by imposing tax.
In conclusion, there are growing trend of eating fast food in some countries and this is considered to be an issue due to it relates to the health of people. Higher taxation on fast food seems to be the possible solutions for the government to control people’s eating habit. Imposing of taxation can be considered as cutting the food source for low income earners because fast foods are the main food for many low income earners. Therefore, government should not impose taxes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 67
- Some people think that the only way to judge someone s success in life is by the amount of money they make Is money a true indicator of the success of a life In what other ways could success in a life be measured 92
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high- for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of healt 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...tax. In conclusion, there are growing trend of eating fast food in some countries a...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.289786223278 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.147268408551 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0973871733967 0.0946595960268 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0380047505938 0.0501214627716 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0166270783848 0.0437548338989 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0997624703088 0.122226691241 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0427553444181 0.0403226058552 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71633853325 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0261282660333 0.0326793684256 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0855106888361 0.0861772015684 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0403800475059 0.021408717616 189% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00712589073634 0.011925033212 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2248.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 365.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15890410959 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397260273973 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254794520548 0.28420135186 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.202739726027 0.203846283523 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142465753425 0.137316102897 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71633853325 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.037074148 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449315068493 0.56093040696 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.396749386 60.7387585426 76% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0891783567 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.25 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5324842504 49.517814964 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.4 127.492653851 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7743622355 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.814263465372 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 43.7294520548 49.1944974215 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.14117647059 1.69124875643 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396930498074 0.332605444948 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106967705702 0.102741220458 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.079679307623 0.0668466124924 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.52398554593 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148542540528 0.148594505496 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156342496582 0.134430193775 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844409716177 0.0742795772207 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375189097706 0.324371583561 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112172191468 0.0638462369009 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282992688865 0.228012699653 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061893860523 0.058150111329 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 2.5751503006 427% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 18.0 10.4468937876 172% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.