In some countries, young people do not take care of their elderly relatives. Instead they appoint trained professionals who take care of elderly. Is it positive or negative trend according to you?
In today’s modern world, owing to rapid changes in lifestyle, work patterns and social setup, young family members do not pay attention to older members of their family. They hire competent professionals for this purpose. However, this development is not very positive and creates social and cultural complications as discussed further.
On one hand, there are numerous reasons that youngsers must take care of the elderly members in family. Firstly, it is moral responsibility of youngsters to take care of older generation. In other words, giving blind eye to old people channelize coming generation to grow up with same understanding, consequently it gives birth to isolation in society which has dire effects on social structure. Secondly, older generation worked hard to raise and nurture the present generation so now it is turn of young generation to payback. Thus families break down at its negligence. Thirdly, elderly people feel rejected, lonely and also suffer from depression and other heath issues as well when off springs have no time for them. Furthermore, hired trained professionals are not family members so do not show the warmth to seniors.
On the paradoxical side, no doubt hiring qualified professionals also have some benefits despite of the drawbacks. To enumerate, they are with elders all the time and provide right treatment and proper diet to old people. What’s more, they prove life savior in case of emergency. Next, youngsters today travel or work in other cities for long period and are left with no other option than leaving trained professional in their absence to look after their parents and grandparents.
In the light of all facts one can conclude that, trained professionals may give competent service and can offer an alternative but it prime duty of youngsters in the family to look after their elders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-03 | Pardeep66144 | 75 | view |
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives, but few people achieve it. What are the causes of the problems? How to overcome it? 84
- Some people trust their first impressions about a person s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct Other people do not judge a person s character quickly because they believe first impressions are wrong Get ready to talk to an 67
- In some cultures, the old age is more valued while in some cultures youth is more valued.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- In many countries children spend long hours on homework Some people think less homework can reduce student s stress and give them a chance to develop other skills What is your opinion about this 73
- What is global warming Discuss the reasons and effects of this phenomenon Suggest some solutions for this problem 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...is turn of young generation to payback. Thus families break down at its negligence. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s so do not show the warmth to seniors. On the paradoxical side, no doubt hiring...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'primes'?
Suggestion: primes
...ice and can offer an alternative but it prime duty of youngsters in the family to loo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24414715719 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85862998943 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9344030699 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.533333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203977380884 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636008780766 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458722953189 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10590295529 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368625685297 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.