Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Today, the world witnesses a huge scientific development in various sectors such as educational and businesses sections. Sharing information with others has increased humanitarian knowledge and exchange commercial sake between nations, While other people believe that increasing threats by extremists and stop scientific progress to developed counties. I totally agree that the human will make advanced steps if information shares between nations.
To begin with first argument, not only exchanging data between states grow up the knowledge in general but also achieving commercial benefits. Moreover, swap information may add the accumulated learning. For example, the humans around the world fulfill great merits from electric invention by Edeson scientist. As consequence, important steps are made in our earth by sharing information between individual persons or nations levels.
On the other hand, others believe that, open resources without restriction may put some states under risk and extremist might utilize this point. In addition, spreading knowledge may kill competition between countries. So, the progress of academic studies will be obstructed.
To sum up, distribution of information has many merits beside some of demerits. In my viewpoint, the more spreading information between nations, the more progression will realize.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT UNPAID COMMUNITY SERVICE SHOULD BE A COMPULSORY PAR OF HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMMES (FOR EXAMPLE WORKING FOR CHARITY, IMPROVING THE NEIGHBOURHOOD OR TEACHING SPORT TO YOUNGER CHILDERN). TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 70
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple, the humans around the world fulfill great merits from electric invention by...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e humans around the world fulfill great merits from electric invention by Edeson...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the demerits') or simply say ''some demerits''.
Suggestion: some of the demerits; some demerits
...n of information has many merits beside some of demerits. In my viewpoint, the more spreading in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in general, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 194.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94845360825 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9339271598 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.70618556701 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9444108558 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23798053984 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782145513064 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538237854921 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13491879992 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459157543956 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.