Sharing information is one of the most basic things which helped humans develop to what we are today and also will lead us to a better future. Many people insist on supporting this for better development of mankind. But, there are significant number of people who argue that it can lead us into dangerous situations.
On one hand, most people firmly believe that the entire success mankind has achieved has been possible only through sharing of knowledge through various forms which include community teaching sessions in the past, which later happened through libraries and through internet in the modern world. They argue that it is best for individuals to gain as much information as possible which would take forward us as a society. For example, as per a recent study, 65% of the major innovations which happened in the last 10 years were done by people who did not have any prior knowledge of the respective field earlier. Most of these people gained the required expertise to turn their ideas into reality through internet.
On the other hand, some people argue that making sensitive information easily accessible to everyone could pose serious threats to the humans when not used in the right manner. This is true to some extent as there have been incidents where extremists were able to learn something very dangerous like making bombs for which the required knowledge is readily available in the form of step by step tutorials on public platforms like Youtube.
Though there is a possibility to misuse the easily available information, it is important to identify that the main factors triggering such activities are diverse like lack of education, socio economic situations etc. Rather than making the knowledge restricted, it is more effective to try and make people's lives better so that such people don't draw encouragement for negative thoughts from their living conditions.
- In many developing countries there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction What measures could be taken to prevent them 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
- There have been some problems with the bus service especially its reliability in your area over the last two weeks Write a letter to the manager of the bus company In your letter describe what the problems are explain how these problems are affecting you 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference Write a letter to a former teacher In your letter give details about the job why it is important to you suggest what information your teacher could put in the reference 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...dge restricted, it is more effective to try and make peoples lives better so that such ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eoples lives better so that such people dont draw encouragement for negative thought...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08360128617 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5878232211 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591639871383 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9115612192 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144004366462 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520049634504 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351808436857 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793390712034 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215548816666 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.