Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, the trend has been changed towards data and technology. A section of society believe that all kind of research are in access of each individuals while other thought that it drived with huge sum of funds, due to this it does not open to everyone. In the course of the essay, I will discuss both sides, with my beliefs.
On the one hand, each country is not able to do work in each field because it involves numerous factor like natural conditions and resources. To develop this planet with more sustainable approches, each country contribute in it with their knowledge. If all countries give access to their finding then it provides oppertunities to those countries who are not able get those results. Also, research labs do not do same experiments which already done by someone else. It also environment friendly by reducing old practices with new innovations. For example, if USA give access to African people to their agriculture methods than may hunger problem will decrease in Africa.
On the other hand, this research only possible by funding which came from taxpayers of that country. People of that country did hard work and earn that money that helps to run labs. The scientist send their time in laboratories and did successfull experiment. Due to this it not fairs to give their achievement to whole world. This acadmical data also contribute to their country because with engineers design new products to sell others.
In conclusion, to develop this togather we need share information to the world while this research possible with huge money which come from taxpayers. I believe that some information will open to everyone which basic need of everyone, like food and diseases.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 58
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 67
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999
- It is increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... contribute in it with their knowledge. If all countries give access to their find...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61444803688 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.678570245 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1335908192 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420706754735 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480047788644 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939045402857 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648962112563 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.