Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible
in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that
some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is a matter of argument whether it is beneficial to let the information be disclosed in the field of research, business, and science. While some hold the conviction that it is necessary to cooperate with each other on combined projects in these sectors, others opine that there are still some secrets, which should remain private, to avoid financial predicament. Not to mention, I support the latter view.
The aforementioned departments are occupied with crucial responsibilities towards humankind. So, most often companies are entitled to work on researches unitedly where they are bound to interchange data. As these types of job are highly sensitive for their accuracy, they often urge on providing accurate information. Nevertheless, abstaining from the presentation of required records may harm the significance of the experiments. For example, research-based initiatives on disease eradication need joined efforts from private and government health authorities. Consequently, projects can fulfil their goal by overall assistance. Nonetheless, sharing key information of a large industry has opposite outcomes sometimes.
Every department of corporations in those three sectors maintains some stringent private policy that is the key to their predominant revenue source. Thus, sharing the indicated resources may prove counterproductive to some extent. As a result, they enforce restrictions on chosen means of production, money-making agenda, and future trajectory. For instance, scientists never expose their invention method until the patent has been accepted. This is why there are lesser possibilities of copyright.
In conclusion, science, business and research has multiple options for disclosing contents. Though interchanging common requirements is essential, the unwinding of the precious stone is brainless.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 84
- The table shows the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university 73
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...redominant revenue source. Thus, sharing the indicated resources may prove counte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95833333333 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34222084809 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4228514632 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164620353966 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419858737831 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448871959205 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895164251789 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495074893534 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...redominant revenue source. Thus, sharing the indicated resources may prove counte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95833333333 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34222084809 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69696969697 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4228514632 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5294117647 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164620353966 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419858737831 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448871959205 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895164251789 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495074893534 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.