It is commonly thought that the data should not be open free for everyone because of the their importance while the others see no harm to share results or knowledge which is related with science or academy. In my opinion, all researches and articles could be seen by everyone because it is actually a contribition for academic world.
On the one hand, many people are scaring that the informations could be used in bad purposes such as damage to society or by vandalism. Likewise, some ignorance people could distort the data for the aim of malignancy even though this datas are full of innocence. Furthermore, valuable ideas could be stolen and it is quite big crime in many countries. For example, in my country, theft of ideas for master or doctorate thesis is the reason for ban from academy. Therefore, people are thinking twice before doing harmful actions related with academic informations.
On the other hand, creating a platform which is full of research, idea and experiments for any kind of students and academicians is maybe the most useful movement for international academy. Additionally, this precious informations could be used for more important research in the future. I think, if ethical conduct is teached to people, there is nothing to consider about troubles as a result of honour. I totally agree with share the every little knowledges with the people and even the world which is pertain to social and pysical science, business or any type of academic area.
In conclusion, many people believe that the essential informations about academic world should not be participate while the others thought it is good that the data is accessible by everyone and I think, share as much information as possibleis pretty good for world of academy.
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 1629221490316151501759 jpg 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ot be open free for everyone because of the their importance while the others see no harm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pertained'.
Suggestion: pertained
... the people and even the world which is pertain to social and pysical science, business...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02380952381 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76446925276 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540816326531 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4048348831 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235666409757 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857910437459 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790140453914 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167165063611 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848289174345 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.