Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A part of society is of the opinion that sharing maximum intel regarding business, scientific research as well as the academic world while others argue that certain pieces of information are too confidential to share. In this essay, I shall discuss both beliefs and reach a logical conclusion.

To commence with, the supporters of the former notion think that by bringing transparency in distribution of data in the aforementioned fields, it will develop a sense of understanding between the citizens and the government in any particular nation. To illustrate, the authorities execute any law for subjects' welfare but sometimes the law enforcement is miscalculated by the public. Consequently, the little misunderstanding assists in breaking strikes, agitations and other protests which ensues various problems such as for health care difficulties since during strikes, there are no proper transportation facilities leading to delay in medicine delivery and many more. But with proper information allocation, these sort of situations can be avoided easily.

As for the latter view, individuals differing with the first ideology opine that it endangers safety of someone's work. To elaborate, by dispensing data freely into public can increase the risk of plagiarism that is copying others' work and displaying it as one's own. Along with imitation of an individual's efforts, there is a bigger problem which is that it can threaten residents' well-being. To explicate, by handing out information openly, anyone can have access to a nation's security systems leading to infiltration, terror attacks and other assaults.

To conclude, after considering the above provided arguments, I side with the latter view as the side effects are a grave concern that cannot be ignored despite the numerous advantages of the former opinion.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 84 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-02-06 MinyiChu 89 view
Essays by user Iqreet Kaur :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...But with proper information allocation, these sort of situations can be avoided easily. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ion openly, anyone can have access to a nations security systems leading to infiltratio...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, regarding, so, well, while, as for, sort of, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48581560284 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11003420575 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641843971631 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7552288964 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165837377841 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562116059723 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763900170405 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102653218962 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974207020496 0.056905535591 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.