Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Open access to information is a trademark sign of the present era as everyone has the opportunity to get any data he or she likes to have. For scientific, educational and trade development information sharing is important but it is significant to be careful about disclosing sensitive info which is not only precious but also can cause personal problem. In my opinion, it is necessary to share data by minimizing its problematic sides.
Firstly, development or upgradation of anything depends on information. For example, if there is no journal on scientific development, then it is not possible for a new person to make further development. Academic education also depends on this. In addition, the latest trade information is also important to keep the track of customer’s demand. Finally, understanding all these things, it is useful to share information so that others can develop themselves and keep contribution to run the wheel of success.
Secondly, information sharing increases the opportunity to contribute more. Readers love to give more authentic information. In this case, contribution of Wikipedia can be mentioned in here. If one wishes, she or he can edit the document. And this webpage is contributing a lot by giving many research based data.
On contrary, one has to be cautions regarding sharing personal information. For instance, in social media, i.e. facebook, twitter, some people love to give their personal details. It is very harmful from various prospective. A criminal can use that data in evil works. Not only that an innocent person can be trapped because of this info. So, everyone should be careful in this regard.
Moreover, a state can face lot of problems, if its secret news come to light. In recent time, various state official’s emails or contract information had been leaked by the website called Wikileaks and it created a lot problems for them. These data are so important that has a great impact on country premiers and its citizens. In these regard, it can be said that everything should not be revealed freely or publicly.
In conclusion, it is not possible to create a bar on sharing information but before disclosing, it can be analyzed that whether it is for everyone or not. I think, it is wise to have access to those areas which will helpful for the wellbeing of human kind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-23 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 90 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views a 78
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people's lives. Others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities. 73
- Recently your employer offered some employees to do some work directly from home. Write a letter to your manger requesting the same arrangement. You should say– Why do you want to work from home?– Why would it be beneficial for the company and yoursel 73
- Many people prefer to travel by car rather than buses or trains.Why do you think this happens?What can government do to motivate people travel by buses or trains? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...webpage is contributing a lot by giving many research based data. On contrary, one has to be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld not be revealed freely or publicly. In conclusion, it is not possible to cre...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0412371134 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03160277218 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548969072165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4787769616 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.24 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.52 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190974960677 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501425816689 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459063496482 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101208492212 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232403287501 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.