Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn about news While others believe that more effective way is through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Gone are the days of awaiting the newspapers for breaking news, sports commentaries and celebrity gossips. Living in the post-digital era, people can keep abreast of up-to-date information with a click of a mouse or at the touch of an app. This prevailing trend, however, has sparked a heated debate about which is the most effective way of getting people up to speed with what is happening in this ever-changing world. Some claim that newspapers are the key pathway to news whereas others think this can be done more effectively through other media. In order to delve deeply into this dilemma, this essay will discuss the pros and cons of the two opposing views and explain why traditional newspapers will be eventually superseded by the internet.
On the one hand, newspapers are thought of as the reliable sources to learn about news due to their authority and accuracy. Most world-famous newspaper companies employ well-experienced editors and journalists to write news articles, and their authoritative comments on different issues usually have a profound impact on society. In addition, each piece of news in newspapers is meticulously verified before being published. People involved in the checking process follow various steps to investigate the authenticity regarding the sources of news, the writing style of articles, and relevant images. Given the credibility, a slight increase has occurred in people reading printed newspapers, and this phenomenon is ascribed to the fake news running rampant in social media. Over a quarter of the U.S. population is reported to have misled by online false information; nevertheless, newspapers strictly examined by conscientious editors are exempt from this accusation.
On the other hand, Internet-based media are considered a more effective alternative to access the latest news because of their availability and efficiency. With a click of a button, people are able to acquire a lot of breaking news anywhere and anytime. For instance, they can stream the FIFA World Cup Final from BBC online channels, Facebook and Twitter, and this is what newspapers can hardly compete against. Moreover, the information people obtain from newspapers is not necessarily the most updated version because journalists can neither add nor revise anything upon their publication. Nonetheless, online news websites and social media apps, as opposed to traditional newspapers, can update their news coverage, thereby assuring readers of the latest information.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that the Internet-based media are undoubtedly the most effective means of staying in touch with the world, as they not only inform the public of what is happening but also bridge the world without any delay.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Gone are the days of awaiting the newspapers for...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, then, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34090909091 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9813331091 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0338168853 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.235294118 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8823529412 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231841417624 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752697156373 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633586536953 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132238935717 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544414499097 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.