Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Compared to the restrictive lifestyle in the past, people nowadays have much more freedom in their life due to the significant advancements in almost every field. Many people think that being offered too many choices could result in a misguided decision, creating undesirable consequences later in their life. This essay will outline why this is such a short-sighted view and being able to pursue whatever you want is the greatest opportunity that should be properly grasped.
To begin with, it is reasonable to suggest that the increasing number of choices offers a wide variety of benefits. In terms of personal life, it acts as a source of motivation to encourage people to follow their own dreams and hobbies, without worrying about any restrictions they may have to face. For example, the availability of online lessons and teachers means that everyone, even the elderly, could pick up their favorite things to learn, including cooking, playing the piano, or even programming. Furthermore, social mobility is also significantly boosted, since many people can easily switch careers without really affecting their lives. Many people who find their jobs unsuitable and unsatisfying are always able to look for new chances in other fields, ready to change their lives for the better.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that some people see this as a worrisome disadvantage. This is becoming more and more popular since many people tend to choose the wrong way and waste much of their time and efforts. However, it can be argued that in such cases, personal deficits are the main factors contributing and that they should have thought more carefully about crucial decisions.
To sum up, having a wide variety of choices brings many advantages that we could never have in the past. People should consider it as an inevitable outcome of the development of our modern society and try to adapt themselves to make the best use of it.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, for example, in fact, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04672897196 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67500951325 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604361370717 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7384461384 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223239672306 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781572585636 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049365859298 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135787338919 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331382135103 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.