The answer is complex since there are a lot of choices in our life and all of them are different kinds. In some case, I would say that it is a good thing to have the ability to choose from a wide variety. Take for example gastronomy. Every single person has different meals on their list of favourites. Actually if you have a bigger family it is almost impossible to cook something that everyone would like. Therefore, I would say that it is great that you can go to shopping centre and choose from a dozen different food types. I can always find something that looks delicious.
Naturally, there are some people who say that it is against evolution. They claim to say that back in the old days we had a perfect life when technically everybody was farming. I personally disagree with tat. I am happy that I could choose a job that fits best to my abilities. I mean no one is the same, why would we want to do the same? Different kinds of universities give us the opportunity to become who we are meant to be. We have the right to choose.
However, there is one topic where, according to my opinion, we have too many choices. This specific area is television. There are hundreds of channels, therefore you can always find something that is worth watching. Literally you could sit in your sofa the whole day and watch films. I think that people doing less outdoor activities are the results of the many available channels. From this point of view, I would agree that we have too many choices.
In conclusion, I would say that we can’t generally talk about choices since they could be different. In some cases, it is good to have many of them while in other areas they could have a negative effect.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 73
- The bar chart below show the percentage of Australian men and women in different age group who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'dozen different food'.
Suggestion: dozen different food
...n go to shopping centre and choose from a dozen different food types. I can always find something that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e a job that fits best to my abilities. I mean no one is the same, why would we w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, i mean, i think, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 24.0651302605 216% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49358974359 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49162799374 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9571691304 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.7272727273 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1818181818 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285540819938 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076835281944 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102621472502 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174044990739 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897376175904 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.0946893788 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.17 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.