Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that technology has made man more social. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In our contemporary society, it’s believed that advancement in technology has impacted some merits on human’s behavior like making them more social. Personally, I partially disagree with this view. In this essay I will put forth some reason to support my notion before arriving at conclusion.
First and foremost, although progress in technology has simplified our daily communication transaction and connection, this phenomenon have been imposed sweeping negative changes in human’s life. With inventing a growing increase in number of digital communicating advances not only have not people required face to face communication less than before, but also human have not tended to meet their family whom can meet their family via social media such as video call in what’s app or telegram.
Secondly, despite the fact that improvement in technology has broaden our minds and facilitated our work responsibilities, it has cause reduced the number of Human Resources. The result of this matter is restriction the need of human contact. In retrospect people tended to have more connection at their work to meet their work needs.
Moreover, nowadays, due to mechanized life human should work a great deal of time for providing enough cash and budget to buying modernized life facilities such as tv, computers, kitchen equipments. Thereby human have less leisure time to lift up their sprits.
In conclusion, given the above consideration, the mechanical part of life has improved by technology, in contrast life in terms of mentally has underwent adversely effects and mental diseases such as depression and seclusion.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-08 ankushgurumaa 78 view
2024-11-30 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-26 Trần Ánh Vy 84 view
2024-11-26 Huyenlbg87 11 view
Essays by user Anabahari :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his view. In this essay I will put forth some reason to support my notion before ...
^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...ommunicating advances not only have not people required face to face communication les...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'broadened'.
Suggestion: broadened
...fact that improvement in technology has broaden our minds and facilitated our work res...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy has broaden our minds and facilitated our work responsibilities, it has cause ...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'undergone'.
Suggestion: undergone
... contrast life in terms of mentally has underwent adversely effects and mental diseases s...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97716892625 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7724985195 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09090909091 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116042386172 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447641649853 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559731965657 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612855625892 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653568149004 0.056905535591 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.