Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
These days, there has been an ongoing argument that voluntary activities should be an obligation for students in high school. I take the view that this idea is relatively reasonable except in several cases
There are a plethora of benefits to this idea. First, since participating in community service give pupils more chance to explore the world surrounding them which in turn stimulate their curiosity or enrich their understanding. The teenager, for example, will never know thoroughly about how vivid nature is until they joint the conservation campaigns, which provides their pratical observations. This evidence supports the view that these activities are enormously rewarding. Second, by implementing this idea, the school could educate their student how to be good citizens and show their respects to society. Indeed, teaching a child to be a good citizens is not simple; thus, adding voluntary work into the curriculum could teach students about the pivotal roles of their help to society.
However, this trend still has some drawbacks. Students are prone to be more stressed involving these voluntaries in addition to some obstacles they confront in their study. If the school apply these activities without considering deliverately, it will trigger some issues such as the severe disputes of parents in virtue of their belief that their offsprings need more time to unwind. Therefore, holding voluntary activities should be proportionate to ensure that youngsters have enough leisure to enjoy their own lives
All in all, the minor disadvantages will never prevent us from concluding that participating compulsorily voluntary work is not excessive, but extremely useful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Jass Rai | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Harf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any 78
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development ? 67
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nderstanding. The teenager, for example, will never know thoroughly about how viv...
^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'citizen'?
Suggestion: citizen
.... Indeed, teaching a child to be a good citizens is not simple; thus, adding voluntary w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50384615385 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87999373356 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3024876452 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.090909091 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11909775972 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473392736749 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036352004509 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720808387354 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334878938171 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.