Recycling is the key to reduce the amount of waste; however, many people are unsatisfied with the level of recycling of domestic waste. In terms of only solution, they suggest to make recycling a legal requirement. While a new legislation would help to solve the issue, it is not necessarily the only way to foster people to recycle their waste.
The primary method to enhance recycling of household waste is motivating citizens by making them aware of this sound management method of waste because lack of knowledge is the key factor that keeps them away from recycling. This is supported by a recent study conducted at Colombo University, in which they claim that 60% of the study population has not heard about recycling before. As a solution for that, local authorities should have to educate people to separate their waste into perishable and non- perishable trash and to handover non- perishable waste such as plastic/polythene, metal and glass to recycling centers. Moreover, the gap between waste generators and recyclers should be filled by establishing more recycling centers. In addition to making people aware, segregated waste collection need to be regularized and facilitated, thereby more recyclable domestic garbage can be obtained. For instance, were garbage trucks available regularly, people are rather willing to load them than to go searching for collecting centers.
Of course, laws can shape human behavior; so that, it can be utilized to increase household trash recycling. Imposing a new law will make people recycle more waste than before; however, this solution will be less efficient than above measures due to the fact that citizens are apathetic and disinterested. Therefore, this cannot be regarded as a sustainable solution for the current state of affair.
Low level of household trash recycling is a concern of many people; they need government to impose laws in order to solve this problem. Although a penalty can force citizens, who do not have knowledge and interest about recycling, to recycle more waste, it will not be sustained. Hence educate them on what they have to do while facilitating the process would be more effective and sustainable.
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with health care issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in th 89
- Question An increasing number of people are buying what they need online What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 73
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with health care issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in th 89
- Computers are becoming an essential part of education Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 56
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e more waste, it will not be sustained. Hence educate them on what they have to do wh...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be more effective and sustainable.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23229461756 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87235361665 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524079320113 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2264877898 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.133333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420162743504 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143131541569 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068312550655 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248605576734 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781451019814 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.