Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste

It is true that waste from households and recycling is not balanced. And some individuals believe governments should increase home recycling opportunities. But I think the right solution for this issue that government should attend education about recycling.
There are several reasons why government make it requirement. Firstly, it could reduce waste in everywhere and make cities clean. We live in a time when the environment and streets are full of rubbish. It leads air pollution and some infectious disease that dangerous for our life. Secondly, recycled rubbish is a new resource for our daily needs and industry. Resources in our planet are limited and remained in small quantities, so humanity need new sources or have to recycle them. Furthermore another advantage of recycled product is that it lowers the cost of some raw materials.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks in this problem. First, they require a lot of money from recycler because the equipments is more expensive and they have to hire workers who collect the rubbish. In addition, if governments want to reduce the waste from households, they should focus on upbringing the young generation in a smart ways. In the words, young generation can create new effective ways of reproducing. Finally, we can say that it is impossible in cities because of shortage of some extra space for collect and save the waste. In fact that cities suffer from overpopulation and some type of waste travels of town.
In conclusion, households and education are necessary to encourage households to recycling. Personally, I believe that there would be more efficiency in recycling if government can balance both laws and education.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that waste from households an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould attend education about recycling. There are several reasons why government...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 492, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ed new sources or have to recycle them. Furthermore another advantage of recycled product i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowers the cost of some raw materials. On the other hand, there are some drawba...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e some drawbacks in this problem. First, they require a lot of money from recycle...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...ringing the young generation in a smart ways. In the words, young generation can cre...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd some type of waste travels of town. In conclusion, households and education ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt can balance both laws and education.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17454545455 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88795961603 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567272727273 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0671615942 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.0555555556 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359428011585 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999031145151 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656145430623 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201897176394 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058890664063 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.