Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Technology has brought many changes in human's lifestyle in terms of reading, behavior and so on, and these changes are partly beneficial for human. However, some opine that there has been found changes in traditional way of reading newspaper with advent of e-books and many more modern technologies. Therefore, I will express my views with partially agree over this statement.
To begin, newspapers and books consider as a treasure of knowledge of various fields, which make someone more competent and aware. Furthermore, in bringing more accuracy and convenience, e-books play a vital role in a manifold ways. Firstly, e-books are easy to carry, accessible, more authentic and one can customize easily as per his/her need, which is the most remarkable feature, which is not in the case of newspaper. Thus, one can easily read about any topic in few seconds which is again less time-consuming and hence, more fruitful for an individual in this hectic world. Secondly, many people have problem to read newspapers or books on account of small size of letters, and this problem has been overcome with the arrival of modern technology. Thirdly, e-books enable someone to highlight key points and store them safely, which is again an unprecedented feature. For instance, researchers do many researches on various topics, thus it is beneficial for them to use modern technology.
However, e-books and modern technology have been accompanied with certain constraints, which can only be filled by traditional way of reading newspaper due to myriad reasons. Firstly, long reading on e-books can create detrimental problems for an individual as a result newspaper readings for long time can be practical here. Secondly, use of e-books and modern technology mean more screen time, which in turn make someone to be under the trap of many fatal ailments such as obesity, sleep apnea and so on, which is completely negligible in traditional way of reading. Thirdly, modern technology is a major source of distraction, thereby people often prefer traditional way of reading, as it is more safer and makes people's mind sharp.
In Conclusion, I opine that technology is a double edge sword, therefore it is completely dependent on human whether to take advantages or disadvantages from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | amrezaeian | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | suraj ashok bhai | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | jessey | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | SNEHA S.R | 78 | view |
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 77
- Some believe that people should not continue to work once they reach the age of retirement. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your experience. 100
- Some people think that art is essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.W 100
- Some government spend massive on an individual for an international sport event rathar than public welfare. Do you agree or disagree? 100
- Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives. What are the reasons for this? How can this problem be overcome? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
...re safe and make peoples mind sharp. n Conclusion, technology is a double edge...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23876404494 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83637631756 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8200924892 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.705882353 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197447612877 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661405994535 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515074796343 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115011320919 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555033546049 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.