Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Poverty and hunger consider as a curse for the humankind, which have made human to think many time to overcome and alleviate such issues. These problems can be easily resolved by economic growth of any country, but many people concede that it may damage environment. Therefore, I am going to shed some light over this statement.
To begin with, a country can never be developed as long as there remains existence of poverty, as it is directly related with the living standard of people. But, economic growth can be an effective method to eradicate poverty and hunger owing to multiple reasons. Firstly, economic growth ensures enhancement in the employment rate, which in turn make people to get an employment and manage livelihood easily which is the best solution to cope with poverty. Secondly, development in every sector completely depends on growth in economy as a result, people can conveniently find many opportunities. Most importantly, economic growth ensures more revenue to government in the form of tax, thus government can easily combat with poverty and can provide services to the public.
However, every situation has certain flaws, which is similar in this case. Development in any country by economic growth may results many alarm situations on account of many reasons. First, growth in economy indirectly related to industrialization which is the major cause of deforestation, consequently people cut many tress or forest which later bring horrendous situation for the living creatures as well as for the human-kind. Secondly, depletion of natural resources is the drastic outcome of economic growth which is not in the favor of any developing country. Furthermore, many environmental problems rise due to economic growth. For instance, ozone layer and global warming are the major aftermaths of economic growth.
In conclusion, I opine that economic growth should be done with the conservation of natural resources, which is desirable for any country as well as for the people.
- Even though globalization affects the world's economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten.What is your view? Discuss.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 100
- These days we are seeing an increasing amount of violence on television and this is having a negative impact on children s behaviour Do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries, the rich are becoming richer and poor are becoming poorer.Why is this problem?What solutions are there to tackle this problem? 100
- Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples. 100
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...mankind, which have made human to think many time to overcome and alleviate such issues. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun tress seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tresses'.
Suggestion: many tresses
... deforestation, consequently people cut many tress or forest which later bring horrendous ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3064516129 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87919986862 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538709677419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2781883164 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215919252591 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834027704585 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511621760184 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141926829436 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201720877511 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.