It is always a controversial debate on subjects that should be emphasized by educators. Some advocate history, while others vote for science and technology. In my opinion, both these pieces of knowledge are equally essential and necessary so that none of them should be neglected.
History is crucial in increasing students' recognition of their home country and cultivating their sense of national pride. By learning the origin of one's own culture and knowing its contributions to the world, the younger generation would generate a feeling of national confidence from the bottom of their hearts. Consequently, they will take responsibility for developing and constructing the country. An excellent example to illustrate this point is the "Han Study" that widely taught in Chinese elementary and secondary schools. "Han Study" is a part of the history subject taught in China, which introduces specific origin, culture and civilization of Han people, the dominant nation in China. Via learning the history of the Han people, children understand better the spirits of Chinese culture and the marvellous civilization created by their ancestors, thereby, develop higher culture recognition and nation confidence. Therefore, history is a subject that shouldn't be ignored in school education.
Similarly, science and technology are also vital in schooling. If history represents the past, then science is a must for students to learn for their future. With the rapid development of technology, the more hi-tech a country masters, the stronger and more competitive a country will be. Teaching science and technology prepares youth ready for this digital world. As a return, these well-equipped young talents will promote the country's development in the future. A statistic figure from the Department of Education of China reveals that the annual budget allocated on scientific equipment and labs in schools for grade 3 to grade 12 students increased 100% in the past five years. Chinese students also won frequently in world-class technical competitions such as Roberts or model airplanes. Thus, science is an essential subject in educating children about technologies.
To sum up, even though history and science are completely different courses, both of them are necessary to cultivate children into useful adults who can contribute to their own home country.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are some more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- In order to adapt to the life in university and succeed, if you are a freshman, which method do you think is better: 1. attending a one-week orientation or introduction program when you are in the university campus and before classes begin 2. meeting regu 80
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime.To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...d. History is crucial in increasing students recognition of their home country and c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 985, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...e. Therefore, history is a subject that shouldnt be ignored in school education. Sim...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56749311295 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01799906312 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573002754821 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7411004983 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.368421053 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166738035104 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526007394827 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324857076222 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989672032746 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191207153414 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.