Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the era of globalization, the connection between various cultures and groups of ages through music has become a hotly-debatable issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that the distances between different cultures and ages remain constant and nothing can break this barrier strictly. Nevertheless, I maintain that several kinds of music can hold people together significantly for many reasons which are put forward in the following essay.
On the one hand, firstly, the elderly generations are too familiar with their country’s folk songs to update with the trend of music these days. Indeed, they consider meaningful lyrics as only ones which are related to peace-loving, nostalgic, or harsh lives in wars. Therefore, trendy and modern lyrics with powerful melodies can disturb their peace. Secondly, it is difficult to make each characteristic love any kind of music which is opposite one’s taste. For example, Americans are sensual, energetic, and intelligent; therefore, they usually express a desire to listen to songs that are related to the true and meaningful life, rather than using imagination to indulge their dreams. Conversely, French are sweet-natured and sensual people, so they tend to listen to romantic songs with harmonious melodies.
On the other hand, listening to other cultures’ music not only can help people to broaden their knowledge about their cultures and traditions but also can arouse the interest in finding more information about it. This can lead to empathy and a close relationship between countries. In addition, the youngster can know more about some obstacles and harsh life because war and lack of food that their parents and grandparents withstood by folk music. After that, they can improve the level of responsibility for taking care of their parents and make their country become more developed.
To sum up, while many people believe that the familiar music and the individual feature make there is no need of listening to music, I strongly incline that music can decrease the gap between cultures and ages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009 60
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25377643505 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79707407296 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6707381868 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16514324777 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581364213641 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457783166725 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113568567808 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482681007978 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.