It is often said that the undergraduates may follow their hobbies to choose the favorite subject, whereas some opinion claims that only practical subjects are allowed for an undergraduate. I understand both opinions, and I believe that keep the various subjects in the university is better than just provide the practical subjects.
There are several reasons why I believe that it is critical for keeping a variety of major. In general, we believe that the future income of a major in university is the most vital thing, the parents would also prefer children to take engineering, technology or medicine as far as pursuing the income in the future. While it is attractive, pupils may bear a huge pressure as long as they are not interested in the practical subjects. A common example of this assumption would be the fact that many undergraduates transfer to their favorite subject after the first year in a practical major, the above circumstance reflects that some kind of pupils may not suitable as soon as they are enforcing to participate the practical major.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that keeping a variety of university majors could provide the choices of occupation. For instance, the university major of a secondary school teacher may be language. While it seems not practical, it is crucial for education as the language major of an undergraduate is natural as well as professional for teaching the language knowledge to the pupils. Hence, each major in university may exist an undeniable value and we cannot overlook the contribution of them.
In conclusion, it is considered to focus the interest of undergraduates as soon as they choose the major in university, which may affect as well as change the prospect of them.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- in spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, look, may, second, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01374570447 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96598413932 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508591065292 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1797244002 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5454545455 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133824775548 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558400533961 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303281300754 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.083376381061 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328646650938 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.