One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that sports facilities ought to provide by companies to their workers. In my opinion, this apprehension sounds to me more rational. This essay will discuss views in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favor of this stance. The most preponderant one is to improve employee health. To elaborate it, when the worker has access to use gym equipment in their office, they can use to become fit and healthy. It can not only contribute to provide better health, but also leads numerous other benefits in various fields such as the decline in the number of sick leaves which usually work takes by workers due to sickness. Thanks to the wide range of advantages sports facilities offers, employees can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives much ease and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned prepositions is that it is only likely to help one excels and thrive by encouraging new staff to join. This is because, the most of workers want to live healthier lifestyle which is not possible for them due to their busy working schedule. So when they get the opportunity to enjoy sports facilities at a job, they get influence to work in such health environment. For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia in March 2012 May 2016, clearly indicates that Microsoft provide gym in their office to influence their new employees to work with them and stay health. Hence, it is clear that why many are in favor of this viewpoint.
On the other hand, a section of society contradicts the above said view by providing some justification that sports facilities should be not provided to employees. The primary factor is that a person's health is their own responsibility, not a comany's. To explain it, if human health is not good, he or she should take care of his body because his or her bad condition is due to their fault so companies should be responsible for providing sports facilities at work. Therefore, some are not favored above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above said view, it is crystal clear that providing health facilities to workers by business is indeed too great to ignore.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 42
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 47
- the best way to protect the environment is used in local resources like food and building materials rather than transporting resources from other places to extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the workers') or simply say ''most workers''.
Suggestion: most of the workers; most workers
...new staff to join. This is because, the most of workers want to live healthier lifestyle which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...employees. The primary factor is that a persons health is their own responsibility, not...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91304347826 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77032396277 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3451522048 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137083877143 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399453663904 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472650343277 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763144816198 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447156034683 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.