some people think that Genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your opinion

As there is continuous revolution of modern technologies nowadays, it is unavoidable that biological techniques are making their own enormous steps forward with one of its remarkable aspect is genetically modified crops. Controversially, the risks of GM food that can occur in the future are of concern to some people. In this essay I will analyse both perspectives and give my own opinion.

Firstly, GM crops are beneficial for us on the economic aspect. As a supportive evidence, an advantageous trait of crops – high resistance, is considered. Studies showed that seeds with adjusted genomes have better immunity to harmful bugs or toxins, and are more resilient to extreme weather conditions. Hence, with lower mortality of crops, farmers are ensured with stable seasons and incomes. Moreover, genetic engineered plants are also worthwhile in terms of feed ingredients for husbandry industry by abundantly providing beneficial macro-elements, and vitamins, which helps livestock herds to have better performance. With higher productivity from the animals, rearers are more likely to maintain a capable finance.

On the other hand, trans-genetic food is considered possibly harmful due to its negative effects on human health. A research in favor of this opinion indicated that some chemicals from the crops after being digested by our gastrointestinal tracts may promote the release of growth hormones – factors inducing early puberty in children. Additionally, another study claimed people who eat GM food regularly seem to have higher chance of gene mutation and cancer. Scientists explained that our immune system cannot adapt with unnatural substances from gene-fixed crops, which ultimately lead to bizarre changes in our body.

In general, it is obvious that genetically modified crops have their own advantageous and dangerous sides. However, I believe if we use them with cautions and as well conduct more in-depth researches, GM food would do us better than harm

Votes
Average: 6.7 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...o its negative effects on human health. A research in favor of this opinion indicated that...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01305948986 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6867472267 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139160207755 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046192486208 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372857124625 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889437057574 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322030114739 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.