Now-a-days, government is doing many activities for people welfare. However, in many families both now both partner’s work. While to increase their financial benefit for that reason they are raring children at home. Some people forced to send their children to daycare centres. While they may or may not get the proper attention as well as care. So, people think that they should get some financial support to one of the parent who stay at home is beneficial to them. However, there are both pro’s and con’s to deciding to do this. In this essay I will discuss some of the reasons.
Let’s begin by looking at the advantages of financial support. One of the main positives of giving support is that, children can enjoy their parent care and supervision while growing. For every children parent is the first teacher as well as his/her role model. Moreover, any child learns by emulating their elders. For instance, UK government provide family child care assistance in terms of money.
Turning to the other hand of the argument, it is difficult to pay money for the government to one of the parent in each and every house. Although if it pay, there is lot of burden on the countries economy. This may often lead to severe damage to lives of common man because of increasing in the prices of the daily products. For instance, the American government is planning to cut off their costs of paying money to parents for the care of their child, because the American economy is facing a decline. Another issue is that, if parents did not send their children to pre-school then as a consequence, they will not develop the social skills with different background children’s.
In conclusion, although the advantages of this approach outweigh the disadvantages, governments should make considerable approaches to assess whether this scheme impacts their economy or not and according to that, decide to apply it.
- People spend too much on family celebrations such as birthdays and weddings?What are the importance of these celebration?Do you think people really spend too much? 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 89
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or more disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 71
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: sending
...ng children at home. Some people forced to send their children to daycare centres. Whil...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 577, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o do this. In this essay I will discuss some of the reasons. Let's begin by looking...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pays'?
Suggestion: pays
...in each and every house. Although if it pay, there is lot of burden on the countrie...
^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...f it pay, there is lot of burden on the countries economy. This may often lead to severe ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01242236025 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73560004034 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5477049847 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9473684211 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34582590944 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980159631258 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641680558749 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191487482716 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604704731763 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.