Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs. Others think that it is better to produce these locally.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The idea of importing foreign movies and TV programs is a debate the first side of which advices that doing so is beneficial to a country’s culture ; however, the second side insists on producing domestic TV broadcasts. While Buying movies from other nations can have some advantages, I would agree with the latter view.
Those who support the notion of purchasing movies from other countries cite that this can bring some benefits.
Firstly, by exposing its citizens to movies produced overseas, a country would seem to become more civilized. This is because the residents can learn about culture and custom of other nations more effectively by means of watching such movies. Secondly, indigenous movies and shows can be the optimal sources for those who want to expand their non-native language. To demonstrate, it has been proven that watching Friends series, an American television sitcom, is an effective way to not only practice english language, but also boost english vocabularies.
On the other side of this debate, the proponents of domestically produced movies assert that these kinds of programs are more essential for societies. The most compelling reason for their assertion is that movies made by local people would help preserve the traditions and customs of their own cultures. For instance, many Iranian Tv programmes remind young generations how people celebrate Nowruz, which is the most significant public holiday in some Asian countries. If young people only watch foreign movies, the traditional values might be gradually forgotten. I agree with this view as the cultural values which identify the people’s nationality is an integral part of any society.
In conclusion, with respect to the controversy over whether it is advisable that countries import foreign movies or not, despite some advantages bringing to the importer society, the former seems to be debunked. This is due to the possibility of the cultural extinction
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | Vibhu Khurana | 61 | view |
- The bar chart below show the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season 67
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- The charts below compare five different countries, showing the electricity used (measured in megawatts or mw) in a typical hospital during one week, and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week. The last char 84
- Please tell me How can I upload picture and give your suggestions in my essay.The following pie charts and the table show how three countries (USA, UK and Malaysia) deal with dangerous waste. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the informa 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The idea of importing foreign movies and TV programs is a debate the first side o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, mind you, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32903225806 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75870377933 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606451612903 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9387338041 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288401268617 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946553904976 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518017504193 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161070157491 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598274307652 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.