Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. While other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many residents have recognized that the advantages brought about by team sports are more numerous, whereas opponents of this idea prefer participating in individual sports. Personally, while single disciplines can exert positive impacts, I opine that collective ones offer more benefits.
On the one hand, there are a number of discernible pluses for which sports with single player are appreciated. Indeed, taking up individual disciplines such as tennis or badminton, to fulfill their inherent aspiration for victory, participants must shoulder a wide variety of responsibilities by themselves, ranging from strategy development, injury recovery to fitness regime planning. Moreover, during tournaments, it is also only on their own will challenge posed by opponents be tackled. As a result, it can be deduced that individual sports honor individualism, in which the more regularly citizens get involved, the more likely they are to be independent. By contrast, if people compete in team sports, they may have many dilemmas dealt by others, leading to a lack in problem-solving skills.
On the other hand, I am in favor of the idea that collective sports are more beneficial because of two major reasons. Firstly, regarding to participants, team disciplines play an important role in fostering interpersonal skills. Specifically, interaction between teammates may instill a whole array of positive traits, contributing to good team players who can prevent breakdown in communication or motivate others to strive. Secondly, regarding to the entire community, another advantage stems from collective disciplines’ ability to strengthen solidarity. In particular, it is obvious that playing as a team brings residents into contact, and this is expected to act as a catalyst for develop mutual sympathy.
Briefly, while gains contributed by individual sports are remarkable, it seems to me that they are still outweighed by those reaped in collective disciplines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | phuong cao | 95 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to a lack in problem-solving skills. On the other hand, I am in favor of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...those reaped in collective disciplines.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas, while, in particular, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7027027027 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30584120959 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635135135135 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.363489216 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.846153846 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1538461538 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175269705592 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055341152217 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041991116911 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982300323985 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343217875646 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.