Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree

Developing countries now take a look on environment for better future. Despite it is general belief by some people that planting trees on ground area where it is open from every direction while, other believed that construct hoses or building for residents instead of planting plants. Although, there are some disagreement on planting, I would agree that tree should planting in open area instead of build an infrastructure.

To begin with, there are numerous reasons for planting trees. Trees provide fresh-air to all and consume carbon dioxide itself for their internal cooking process. Also some time provide shade to vendors who venturing city to city. Good illustration of this, there are many families are planning a long trip via road and in between when they want to take a rest at that time they find for some lace when they can seat freely with fresh-air at that time this kind of trees are worked out. Secondly, when this type of tree become older at that time they are cut by workers and used in various items like wooden dish, tables, papers and many more. For example, after demolishing tree it is distinguish in various field according to their size and type of wood and then send it to industry, where this kind of wooden work are done.

On the other hand, it is good to plant trees but there are many peoples are there, who are have not even house to dwell that’s why constructing housing on open area are main point. There are many places are there where government take this places as make houses for those, who cannot afford high price houses in city. In this case, people, who are from the low level community get their own house to live. Furthermore, an increasing population leads the problem of staying there are many people are there who lives on road and live their life at risk for this reason it is good to construct houses are concerning point.

In conclusion, there are many reasons are there to build houses on the open are but negative side also there. While construct building or houses are beneficial, I firmly agree with that advantage of planting tree on open area are far away.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...elf for their internal cooking process. Also some time provide shade to vendors who ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'distinguished'.
Suggestion: distinguished
...r example, after demolishing tree it is distinguish in various field according to their siz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...s but there are many peoples are there, who are have not even house to dwell that’s why...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ere are many peoples are there, who are have not even house to dwell that’s why cons...
^^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s reason it is good to construct houses are concerning point. In conclusion, there are many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72043010753 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33058780051 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513440860215 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5296638459 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.066666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213581588534 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783040827645 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591779441908 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13733219173 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330635087277 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.