In the past, society was separated into a variety of classes, which stemmed from how many belongings each person had. Until now, The classification in society has remained unchanged and has branched off into two major classes comprising the upper class and poverty. While the former enjoy their life with much money sourced from their work, the latter is often worried about how to earn and pay economically. Therefore, it is believed that the establishment of crimes mostly comes from the poverty class. From my perspective, I automatically approve of this opinion, which is illustrated by this essay.
To begin, when being poverty, there are many privations and pressures put on the people leading to an increase in crime. For instance, in lieu of freely shopping without being embarrassed in the wealthy class, the poverty often calculate and compare the cost. If they do not do that, they can not pay for the series of permanent bills each month comprising water and electricity. Their world is frequently revolved by money issues and they do not know how to escape it. In some urgent contexts that demand them much of money such as diseases, they will be under heavy pressure. The despair, which breeds many negative thoughts and behaviors, can support them being the crimes.
Moreover, when poverty is compared with the upper class, dissatisfaction, and ambition facilitate crime thinking. When people are born, they can not choose which family for them. Some individuals are fortunately born into wealthy families and have the ideal conditions and environment to improve; however, others are less lucky when being born in poverty and having a hard childhood. A part of poverty often thinks unfair, which stimulates their jealousy of the rich and what they have leading to crimes.
In conclusion, The lack of money to support life is the major reason causing the growth of the crime rate. From my knowledge, crime or not hinge on the morality of each person. If they are positive about their circumstances and plan for the future, their adjustment day by day contributes to their new better life.
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 89
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 61
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it 89
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress What extent do you agree or disagree 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y contributes to their new better life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6586785117 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.005375878 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150205367648 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491135983469 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045170588354 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865982345668 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310236498149 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y contributes to their new better life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6586785117 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.005375878 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150205367648 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491135983469 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045170588354 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865982345668 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310236498149 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.