there are many students who have different abilities. Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic skills, while there are others who believe that it is better students with a variety of abilities study together. In my honest opinion, I believe that students with different skills should be together.
On the one hand, the option to select students based on their educational abilities is attractive for several reasons. Teaching to students who have an equal academic level is easier. This means that, when a group of learners has an equal range of academic skills, the teacher can easily go to the next step because all students understand the lessons as well as and there is no need to repeat lessons just for a few of students and can focus on specific issues, instead of, lessons with lower importance. Another reason is when knowledge of students is on the same level, the time of the class never wastes because of those students who can’t realize the lesson as others.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for pupils to study together. Firstly, children who are weak, have to study more and more and improve themselves to reach other classmates. Secondly, this diversity of skills can be useful to students because they can teach lessons together with a common language, and in between, these children learn about teamwork and social interactions. For example, when some students couldn’t solve the mathematic problems, other classmates who are cleverer can help weaker individuals to learn and solve practices. Finally, it is a competitive atmosphere for learning and become a successful person.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their educational life and follow their career in the future if they study in schools where there are all kinds of students with different talents and skills.
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should be responsible for it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 86
- You have a bicycle that you are no longer using You would like to sell it to a friend write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you are no longer using your bicycle describe your bicycle explain why you think your friend would like to have 82
- You have a bicycle that you are no longer using You would like to sell it to a friend write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you are no longer using your bicycle describe your bicycle explain why you think your friend would like to have 68
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for 56
- In the last decade, there has been an increase in the number and variety of online courses available to adults. While welcomed as a great opportunity by many students, other students see these courses as a poor substitute for classroom teaching. What are 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there are many students who have different ab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09034267913 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63708223156 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510903426791 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1001163233 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.692307692 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3909742989 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161890262972 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136503945746 0.0667982634062 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27664755321 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191066422865 0.056905535591 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.