Nowadays, compulsory subjects which are included in every educational system of the world such as science or social science are considered the most important task of students. Meanwhile, some people suppose that students had better learn about nourishment and some relative issues in order to lead a healthy life. This essay will illustrate two given opinions.
For starters, it is assumed that learning and practising the science of food besides the school activities will help students have a general and various glance at human nutrients, and consequently, a healthier lifestyle. Following this opinion, the educational Ministry should introduce or insert a new subject which might be called "Food science" for students in the compulsory section of the schooling system. As a result, students can be exposed to the most fundamental knowledge of food, they might influence their relatives about a balanced diet which bring them a better old age. Furthermore, the students' next generations will be positively impacted and we will have a healthier community without obesity or other hazardous diseases related to food nutrients.
On the other hand, others claim that students and undergraduates should only study the essential subjects which produce them a good career or a high-paid occupation. According to this viewpoint, school time is limited and extremely significant for a student to set a practical goal and reach it by swotting maths or computer science. These subjects are not only important for reaching human enormous knowledge but also create a promising career path for the students. Thus, many people believe that student should only spend their valuable school time on the former task without the distraction of any unnecessary things.
In summary, people are divided into two opposite viewpoint that whether students had better devote their time to learn fundamental subjects or they should spend a bit of their time on experiencing the science of food. Personally, I reckon that alongside studying principle subjects, students should take times on researching food's nutrients and its cuisine.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 92
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'viewpoint' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'viewpoints'.
Suggestion: viewpoints
...y, people are divided into two opposite viewpoint that whether students had better devote...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, i reckon, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47416413374 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86524751042 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577507598784 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9784588951 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.538461538 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326164223945 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112640355137 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594652832953 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198030052857 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401984280411 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.