Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many people consider that wildlife fauna conservation preserved by several community communities is excessive and overwhelming. I, personally, state the same perspective of this issue for the reasonable points, which will be deliberated in this following essay.
On the one side, providing attentiveness more helps to balance population to predator-prey cycles. Focusing on a report by Wild Wildlife Fund (WWF), there is one of aggressive seabirds recognized as parasites, Artic Skuas, eating the same species. Furthermore, offering a lot of resources to poor animals such as dogs and cats is the best way to protect them. Accordingly, several people, particularly animal lovers, would participate to provide animal shelter, in order that the ones living on street and under-bridge can be saved, while campaigning the humanity act to society.
On the flip side, the preference of good news reported by media should be focused more on National Disaster Recovery Framework (NDRF) rather than overreacting to wild fauna. To illustrate, Japanese’s news reveals how to alleviate a community disaster trauma with improving preparedness at any occurrence. In addition, financial support given to improve technological system in public health care is more beneficial to overcome medical emergencies in the future. For example, many people in Hong Kong consume popular raw seafoods, abalone and oyster, indicating much/thousands of bacteria afflicting infectious diseases. Thus, such system can lower the percentage of pandemic outbreaks.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, conservation wildlife species along with resources is overreacting to some extent. Those can be better off caring disaster recovery on the news as well as providing the best quality of medical care. This is as long as organisations do conserve animal shelters well-survived.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | ktoan | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | ngo viet | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Stella2003 | 89 | view |
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 89
- Some think dangerous extreme sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree 84
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some believe that giving final assistance can increase the poverty rate while others think this is one of ways to reduce it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- People now days send text massages more frequently than they talk the phone What are the reasons for this trend Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...sources is overreacting to some extent. Those can be better off caring disaster recovery ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70036101083 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21908723781 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657039711191 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1752136703 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13299469759 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405042677278 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339260370044 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701907734213 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209388160632 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.