Nowadays, some teenagers choose to travel for one year after their high school graduation. It makes a gap year in their plans for the rest of their life. Some believe that traveling for one year improves the way of thinking about life. But some regard it as a waste of time and money. This points of view will be discussed in this order.
It is believed by some that traveling has several benefits as it enhances minds ability in confrontation with new subjects. subjects like human's right, respect to countries rules, and urban designing methods in first world countries, would make a mental challenge for young travelers that lead to their maturity. Thus, it can be argued that traveling for one year can broaden young people's horizon. After analyzing this fact, it is clear why many support this claim.
On the other hand, it is accepted by some that young people should continue their professional life without interruption. In a world of rapid change, the longer you are unemployed, the less likely you are to find a job. The link between success in career and applying soon for the job is clear. Therefore, it is for this reason that some refute the idea of a gap year in the youngers life plan.
For reasons of creating a new perspective and the importance of time in finding good jobs, the idea of a gap year is supported and refuted by many. however, it is clear that consuming financial savings and wasting time at that young age is not logical. Thus, the argument that a gap year is needed for broadening mind is not supported. it is hoped that young people, regardless of the decision they make, will continue to be successful in life.
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Discuss the problems and Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities. 78
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children? 61
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 41
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online. The table shows the average number of people online each year. 78
- The recent years' sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy. For some this is a benefit, raising the profile of sports, but for others, it is a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subjects
...ity in confrontation with new subjects. subjects like humans right, respect to countries...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 382, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...raveling for one year can broaden young peoples horizon. After analyzing this fact, it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youngers'' or 'younger's'?
Suggestion: youngers'; younger's
...me refute the idea of a gap year in the youngers life plan. For reasons of creating a n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... year is supported and refuted by many. however, it is clear that consuming financial s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d for broadening mind is not supported. it is hoped that young people, regardless ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67465753425 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49642970806 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541095890411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2439851511 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2941176471 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340697457987 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113268192711 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585054056705 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215852563676 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576874101074 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.