In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
It is astonishing that famine is still prevalent in many countries whose agriculture have been undergone constant development. Although the increasing unemployment rate and the cost of agricultural products are the main cause of this, there are number of effective strategies that can be applied to tackle such problem.
It is believed that the rise in unemployed people and product prices are the main reasons resulting in millions of starving bellies. As advances are brought to the agriculture, activities such as farming and harvesting of crops are now done by state-of-the-arts machines. This significantly reduces human labour and eventually ends up with many jobless people. Besides, Climate change is another reason which is worth mentioning as it brings about the devastating consequences to the growth of crops and their yields. Hence, This poses a surge in prices of the agricultural products and results in people finding it difficult to afford the price of such food.
Since the number of hungry people is rising continually, immediate actions need to be taken into account to halt it. First, combining the contributions between conventional labour practice and technology not only lower down the unemployment rate, but also the cost of agricultural machines and eventually the product prices. Thus, this make food affordable to almost everyone. Furthermore, to maximise the productivity of crops, improvements are needed to be made in the systems that forecast extreme event. This is to help farmers keep track with natural disasters such as storm, be well-prepared with the prevention methods to these problems.
In summary, every problem has its own solution so famine is no exception. By carrying out the right methods, agricultural activities can be done cost-effectively and problems of hunger will be reduced to the minimum level.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 84
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods others argue that customers should avoid buying with a lot of packaging discuss both views and give your own opinions 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of household in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ethods to these problems. In summary, every problem has its own solution so fa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, thus, well, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40689655172 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11130041136 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0989210502 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27042120917 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794279493595 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452337382195 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156763270225 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256378197318 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.