In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, thanks to the development in technology, science and other fields, agriculture has experienced a great number of advances. However, there is still a large number of people in the world who have insufficient food sources. This essay will highlight some main causes of this and suggest possible measures to alleviate this problem.
One cause of this problem is that agriculture suffers from natural disasters every year. To be specific, the devastation of extreme weather events seriously affects food production in many areas in the world. For example, Vietnamese residents living in the central area can lose a great number of provisions if droughts occur in the rainy season. To mitigate this problem, the governments and organisations should work together in order to help local residents affected by these events. Particularly, the governments can associate with the meteorological organisation to warn early of extreme events. For instance, farmers warned of a coming flood would prepare essential equipment or construction to save their crops and cattles. As a result, they can reduce the impact of natural disasters on their food production.
Another reason is wars and conflicts which are taking place in many parts of the world. In other words, these events may force people to move to a new country where they have difficulties in making ends meet. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has had an impact on many residents, who have to quit their jobs and homes, so those food sources are lacking. An effective method that should be implemented to tackle this issue is that international governments should bring in laws and stricter regulations in order to deal with violent attacks. For instance, Russia and Ukraine need an agreement in stopping conflicts and wars which are threatening the lives of millions worldwide. Clearly, this solution can help to provide enough food sources for people and stabilise humans’ life.
In conclusion, various approaches could be implemented to help reduce the impact of natural disasters as well as conflicts and wars which are taking place in the world. Therefore, residents’ provisions from agriculture could be ensured.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Nuclear energy is the best source of power for today s global energy needs To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...er of advances. However, there is still a large number of people in the world who have insufficie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34293948127 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86789708529 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553314121037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.435428389 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222091094269 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678760335042 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521946272585 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138039359941 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462894103002 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.