In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Agriculture has developed remarkably recently thanks to the development of technology. However, there are still people in significant areas have to suffer from starving due to several reasons which can possibly be tackled.
There are some motives that cause a lack of food. Firstly, people living in regions which are affected severely by natural disasters such as floods, droughts, thunderstorms, earthquakes and the like cannot have the opportunities to develop their agricultural industry. For example, in areas which are covered by deserts, crops and vegetables cannot be planted normally; therefore, citizens there still go hungry due to the detrimental nature. Secondly, there are numerous conflicts happened among nomads or regions like religious conflicts, political conflicts, civil wars, and the like. As a result, people have to move to another place to find peace which also results in the lack of food and land for farming.
However, the problem can be resolved with several solutions. In terms of food shortage due to severe nature, governments can prepare food aids in advance. Canned food, dried meat of fruits, fresh water and the like are extremely necessary for people who are suffering from the consequences of natural disasters. In fact, people in the middle of Vietnam are prone to several tremendous floods yearly, which destroy thousands of plants and animals as well. However, authorities have provided them with food aids in order to help them survive and set up their lives again. Additionally, from the disagreements’ perspective, governments should be responsible for the peaceful situation of those sensitive areas by enact laws to mitigate conflicts or fights among people. Only by doing so can people feel safe to settle down and focus on producing food to get over poverty and hunger.
In conclusion, there are several reasons which lead to the lack of food in some region worldwide; however, the problem can be eliminated by the care of governments and other people. We should join hand to help each other who are in adversities since we are also brothers and sisters in this world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-10 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker 75
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 84
- The diagram below show some principles of house design for cool and for warm climates 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...of technology. However, there are still people in significant areas have to suffer fro...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...m starving due to several reasons which can possibly be tackled. There are some motives t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25513196481 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83948512227 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557184750733 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9958812694 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130950574006 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446450625043 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397018686355 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871084809488 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217716581193 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.