Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Thanks to the advancement of technology, students nowadays have a wide range of absorbing knowledge, two prominent examples include offline and online classes. A school of thought holds that the direct learning mode will show greater effectiveness compared to that of the other, and this essay is going to prove that this belief is true.
Offline classes are ideal environments for students to apply themselves in learning and carry out learning activities in earnest. These direct classes with certain obligatory rules and pressure are the motivation of students to receive knowledge faster in a serious mode. However, students studying via online platforms are likely to do everything freely without the tight control of teachers, and this may lead to deteriorating academic results. For example, teachers can organize interesting activities in the classroom to help students remember lessons better, conversely, these methods could be challenging to implement in the virtual environment and this group of students will probably distract from studying easily.
Studying in the offline classroom could also act as a form of socializing for people who demand to actively enlarge their social circles or improve their relationship. Through face-to-face conversation, students can get along with each other effortlessly as mutual emotions can be captured and communication will be effectively made. Those who study from home do not have such an environment to develop, and this may cause indifference among the students, which is considered a disadvantage in the learning process in general.

To sum up, due to the aforementioned reasons, I lean toward the idea that learners are likely to gain more benefits in a classroom with a group of students rather than in the remote classes on digital platforms.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-07 quoctoan@ 78 view
Essays by user quoctoan@ :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a serious mode" with adverb for "serious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...of students to receive knowledge faster in a serious mode. However, students studying via online ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'implementing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: implementing
...ely, these methods could be challenging to implement in the virtual environment and this gro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he remote classes on digital platforms.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, may, so, for example, in general, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44128113879 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99569732356 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8870158279 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.9 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213907675353 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797034983167 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325437757181 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120484940963 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035999730233 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.