Although in the past, people had only face to face interaction, in modern times, technology brought changes in human communication. Some people may argue that this change is positive, while others say it will worsen our personal relations. I firmly believe that gadgets can be an improvement to our society.
As a starting point in the discussion, let us focus on the way technology affected human relations. To be more specific, we have to consider the internet, and also gadgets, as the smartphone. For instance, the internet allow us to communicate from almost anywhere, therefore no matter how long is the distance, we are always close to the people that we love. In addition to this substantial point, the appearance of smartphones, further changed the way we interact with each other, by introducing applications, like Skype, which allow long distance video calls. These are just are just some examples in the way new technology change the way we interact.
Now let us focus on the consequences, which I believe that are mainly positive. To clarify this, we should think about the affect that high tech can have on education and on health. For example, teachers have tools, like never before, to explain their knowledge, like using augmented reality to demonstrate a engineering prototype to their students. Finally, and most importantly, the health care is also in a revolution. For example, if a patient have a suspect melanoma (a malignant lesion in the skin), a picture of a lesion can be sent to a specialist in matter of seconds. These supporting facts show us why a positive change is already happening with new technologies.
In summary, it is clear that many changes had occurred thanks to new gadgets, and above all we should expect a positive impact in the way we interact, by bringing us closer together, but especially when we consider the improvements to the fields of education and healthcare.
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'are just'.
Suggestion: are just
... allow long distance video calls. These are just are just some examples in the way new technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... using augmented reality to demonstrate a engineering prototype to their students...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92387131001 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565625 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0716704748 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219058460415 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680078496694 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606407049869 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126549075712 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552032859047 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.