In recent years, advertising and marketing play a huge role for companies. Some people believe that because of advertising, the sales of products or goods become high and these types of products are not the actual needs for society. This essay will discuss why people are buying goods just because of the advertising rather than their needs.
Nowadays, a number of famous persons are influencing people for buying products that are not required. Moreover, some people will purchase when their favourite actor acts in the advertisements. For example, there are plenty of companies that are hiring popular celebrities as the Puma brand has collaborated with Virat Kohli. As a result, a lot of his fans are just purchasing goods that they do not need. In short, the high sales of popular goods because of the promotion and they are actually not the real needs of society.
There are so many innovative ideas to represent advertisements that are available which are affected to customers. Furthermore, the way of representing any advertisement make a huge difference in the sales. For instance, some companies are promoting their products like real-world experience. That is why so many people are easily attracted. However, sometimes they do not advertise their product in a good way so they will lose their buyers. Overall, because of the different styles of advertisements, it will be attracted by people and the unwanted goods are sold.
It is increasingly likely that the growth of sales of consumer goods definitely reflects the advertisements. However, there are plenty of products are sold which are not needed for society. Ultimately, a number of individuals will buy products because of the advertisements.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 61
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21660649819 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98835423747 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501805054152 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6243753543 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231913964491 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080568376462 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776648619441 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154428551552 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265493047054 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.