At present, experimental inquiry are funded by private businesses rather than the authorities. From my stand point, the advantages are rewarding and prevail the downside by a huge margin.
Statistics had proven that exploration paid by independent companies can yield a more favorable result in contrast to those funded by the government. As a matter of fact, most organization's ambition are beneficial to economical and social growth, and in result will be supervised and monitored more effectively to eliminate the possibilities of aberration that might occur during projects. Private companies are more conscious about distributing their resources, like labor and money, and in return more certain in their result. If the local ministry, by any chance, support an experiment financially, the pressure arises from public disagreement might interrupt the project mid-way, so therefore those deposit are better off spent on upgrading transportation and facilities.
But there are a lot of other things that need to be taken into consideration. Firstly, not many organizations are willing to cut a portion of their expense for researching. Taking such huge responsible while maintaining it's own survival might be to much of a venture. Some companies will even abuse and utilize illegal methods in order to save up budgets, for instance like taking dangerous shortcuts. Permitting independent association to be in charge of these project mean the government's specialist cannot fully manage them.
But in the end, I am confident that by allowing private funding, we can venture even farther beyond the border of our capability and archive far more than ever before.
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 82
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 73
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...e government. As a matter of fact, most organizations ambition are beneficial to economical a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'so' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: so; therefore
...nt might interrupt the project mid-way, so therefore those deposit are better off spent on u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...e maintaining its own survival might be to much of a venture. Some companies will ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4555984556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0822807585 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664092664093 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7437334848 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111976442011 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377704521322 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328711402229 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682268501844 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027581888671 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.